Master of Business Administration

Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary

1 2

This program has multiple interview rounds. You are viewing Round 1.

Switch to Round 2 →

2027 Admissions Interview Question Bank* (UCALGARY HASKAYNE MBA — Async)

Motivation Fit
•

Why do you want to pursue an MBA at the Haskayne School of Business?

Text

Analysis

  • Why asked: Haskayne School of Business at the University of Calgary is known for its energy sector expertise, entrepreneurship focus, and Calgary's oil and gas industry proximity—interviewers want candidates who have researched these specific strengths.
  • Expectations: Strong candidates describe Haskayne's energy and resources curriculum, Calgary's corporate headquarters concentration (including energy multinationals), and specific Haskayne programs like the Hunter Centre for Entrepreneurship and Innovation.
  • Strong answer: An outstanding answer shows the candidate understands Haskayne's positioning in the Alberta energy and business ecosystem, names specific career targets in Calgary's industries, and explains why Haskayne's alumni network and curriculum serve those targets better than peer programs.
  • Common mistakes: Treating Haskayne as a generic Canadian MBA without engaging with its energy sector and Calgary-specific strengths; or choosing Haskayne purely for geographic reasons without a compelling program-fit argument.
•

What skills or abilities do you hope to improve through the MBA program?

Text

Variants

  • Reflect on your professional experience. What new skills do you expect to gain during the MBA program, and how will you use them in your future career?

Analysis

  • Why asked: This developmental question tests whether you have done genuine self-assessment — identifying specific gaps between your current capability set and what your post-MBA goals require — rather than seeing the MBA as a generic credential.
  • Expectations: Strong candidates name specific, credible skill gaps: financial analysis for a non-finance background, strategic frameworks for someone moving from execution to management, or cross-functional communication for a technical specialist transitioning to general management.
  • Strong answer: Name two to three specific skills, briefly explain why each exists as a gap given your background, and describe how the program will address it — referencing specific courses, experiential projects, or peer learning opportunities demonstrates that you have thought through the learning plan.
  • Common mistakes: Naming soft skills only (like 'leadership' or 'communication') without specifying a concrete developmental target signals lack of specific self-assessment; equally weak is identifying gaps so generic that any professional would claim the same development need.
Resilience Adaptability
•

Tell me about a failure you experienced.

Text

Variants

  • Describe an initiative you took that did not turn out well. What lessons did you learn from it?

Analysis

  • Why asked: Failure questions test intellectual humility, self-awareness, and the candidate's relationship with setbacks—traits that predict whether they will learn from the MBA experience rather than just collecting credentials.
  • Expectations: Strong candidates describe a genuine professional failure (not a disguised success), take clear personal responsibility, explain the root cause analytically, describe what they learned, and provide evidence that they have applied the lesson.
  • Strong answer: An outstanding answer shows authentic humility: the candidate doesn't minimize the failure or externalize blame, demonstrates genuine insight into what went wrong, and can point to a specific subsequent situation where they made a different choice because of the lesson learned.
  • Common mistakes: Choosing a failure that is actually a success story in disguise ('I worked too hard and succeeded anyway'); or describing the failure without a substantive lesson or evidence of behavioral change—making the reflection feel performative.
Teamwork Collaboration
•

How have you handled conflict in the workplace? Please give an example.

Text

Variants

  • Can you share an experience where you resolved a conflict between two parties in a team?
  • Describe a time when you had a disagreement with your team over priorities. How did you handle it?

Analysis

  • Why asked: Conflict management is a core interpersonal competency, and this question tests the candidate's ability to address disagreement constructively rather than avoiding or escalating it.
  • Expectations: Strong candidates describe a genuine interpersonal or professional conflict, explain their approach (active listening, finding shared ground, escalating appropriately), and show that the resolution preserved the working relationship.
  • Strong answer: An outstanding answer demonstrates emotional intelligence: the candidate shows they understood the other party's perspective, separated the issue from the person, and found a resolution that addressed the root cause rather than just ending the tension.
  • Common mistakes: Describing a conflict that was resolved by a third party (manager or mediator) without showing the candidate's active role; or framing the story so the other party is entirely at fault—suggesting lack of self-awareness.
Current Affairs Social Awareness
•

Please write about how diversity impacts the bottom line of small and medium enterprises or large companies.

Text

Analysis

  • Why asked: This written question tests the ability to make a data-driven business case for diversity — going beyond values-based arguments to demonstrate genuine understanding of the commercial mechanisms through which diversity creates or destroys value.
  • Expectations: Strong candidates identify specific, evidence-based mechanisms (diverse teams produce better decisions, broader market access, higher employee retention, improved innovation rates), distinguish between different types of companies and how diversity's impact varies, and acknowledge that diversity without inclusion does not produce the expected commercial benefits.
  • Strong answer: An outstanding answer uses research evidence to support specific causal claims, distinguishes between SME and large company contexts where the mechanisms may differ, and engages with the complexity — showing that diversity's commercial benefits are real but contingent on management practices that enable diverse teams to function effectively.
  • Common mistakes: Candidates often assert the business case for diversity without citing specific mechanisms or evidence, or they conflate the moral argument with the commercial argument — leaving the reader without the analytical framework that connects workforce composition to actual bottom-line outcomes.

*Disclaimer: This question bank is compiled and generated by MockMore (mockmore.com) based on applicant feedback, historical data, and our proprietary AI model. MockMore is an independent platform and is not affiliated with any university or video interview platform (such as Kira Talent, VidCruiter, InitialView, Vericant, etc.).

Interview Experience Records (from Real Candidates)

* The records were obtained from publicly available data or contributed by users of MockMore (mockmore.com), then reviewed and refined by our AI models.

Send Feedback